Two HCPs. One engine. No labels.
Everything here is invented for illustration, a made-up cancer drug we'll call KENVARA, for lung-cancer patients who've run out of standard options. At launch, the client's top priority is getting the right patients tested.
Illustrative, sample data- Where
- Regional clinic network
- Visibility to legacy tools
- Invisible to KOL tools, publishes nothing, presents nowhere. Rich in prescribing data.
- Where the gap shows up
- Treats plenty of eligible patients but isn't consistently ordering the test.
- Where
- Teaching hospital
- Visibility to legacy tools
- Publishes and presents constantly. Has clearly mastered testing already.
- Where the gap shows up
- Recent talk positioned the drug using an out-of-date treatment sequence.
Same engine, two completely different HCPs, no labels applied to either. The system simply read what each one needed against the strategy.
The strategy moves. So does the plan.
Testing is now widespread, so home office shifts the priority to sequencing. Nobody re-entered anything. The strategy moved, the HCP moved, and the plan followed both.
His own testing has improved, we can see it in the data, so his need on that dimension drops away.
Rises up the "who to see next" list, her sequencing gap now meets the highest priority.
Try it yourself.
The interactive demo lets you flip the strategy and watch the plan re-rank in real time.
Open the demo